代寫論文價碼：政府如何影響專業新聞的存在
專業新聞是按照赫爾曼(Hermann, 1996)提出的宣傳模式來控制新聞的。赫爾曼的討論是關於政府如何影響專業新聞的存在。如果把政府看作是影響新聞從業人員的權力，那麼新聞機構也可以做類似的類比。新聞機構是權力的源泉。職業記者，無論男女，都在他們的控制之下。理解這種控制將有助於公眾更好地理解媒體表現(Kovach & Rosenstiel, 2000)。這也有助於更好地理解路易絲·諾斯的論點。 North的文章也提供了非常有說服力的證據，表明該行業存在性別偏見。有孩子的婦女沒有得到正確的支持，因此管理職位上的女記者人數和獲得更好作品的機會似乎受到限制(Pierce, 1995)。
現在，根據通過內容分析進行的初步研究，由此可以確定，一般來說，女性可能會獲得較少的新聞。因此，這部分假設得到了證實，但沒有多少理論證據直接表明女性被給定的“不受歡迎的”新聞(如生活方式新聞)邊緣化。這是需要跨多個新聞機構和更大樣本的研究。對期刊板塊樣本進行的內容分析研究表明，男性確實獲得了更多關於體育和政治的內容，而女性則獲得了有關生活方式的內容。然而，這不能理解為一種廣義的觀點。為了證實這一事實，建議進行更多的研究。其次，初級研究和次級研究都支持新聞業確實存在一定程度的性別偏見的觀點。
代寫論文價碼：政府如何影響專業新聞的存在
Professional journalism is controlled journalism according to the propaganda model presented by Hermann (1996). Hermann’s discussion is with respect to how government influences on professional journalism exist. If government was considered as the power that influenced the journalists with the news sources, a similar analogy could be drawn with the journalistic institution. The journalistic institution is the power source. The professional journalists, both men and women come under their control. Understanding this control will help the public better understand media representation (Kovach & Rosenstiel, 2000). This also enables a better understanding of Louise North’s arguments. The article of North also presents very compelling evidence to the point that there is a gender bias going on in the industry. Women with children do not get the right support and hence the number of women journalists in managerial positions and access to better writings hence seem to be curbed (Pierce, 1995).
Now according to the primary research conducted by means of content analysis, it is hence established that women might be allotted less news in general. Hence, this part of the hypothesis is proved, but there is less theoretical evidence to directly suggest that women are marginalized by the given “un-wanted” news such as the lifestyle news. This is something that needs to be researched on across multiple journalistic institutions and with a much larger sample. The content analysis research done on a sample of journal segments indicates that men do get more content on sports and politics and women get assigned content on lifestyle. However, this cannot be understood to be a generalized view. It is recommended that more researches should be carried on in order to establish this as a fact. Secondly, both primary research and secondary research support the idea that the journalism industry does have a certain amount of gender bias.