In more current times it is technological fixes such as recycling and more that is being addresses, however for a longer range of concerns, it is necessary for the planning to preserve to use more in-depth movements. This is the ideology behind the deep ecology movement. These fixes however are not holistic as they only solve an aspect, they do consider nature and its beings and everything in it as the stakeholders, it is either increased carbon or reduced rain forests etc, these are not seen in a holistic sense by policy makers.
In discussing quantum mechanics, Prigogine (1989) presents how when although it is possible to prepare the initial electron of the initial change in many ways, whatever happens or whatever a scientist tries to influence it, it ultimately escapes control. It escapes control and moves into dissipating its vibration energy into transition. There is a form of instability in all the stability and there are also elements of irreversibility (Prigogine, 1989). A slightly different form where connection between religion sciences, the cosmos and ecology are discussed can also be presented. Cosmic ecology sees everything as interconnected and this includes culture and religion. Everyone is responsible for the actions of everyone else. Religion and spirituality has evolved with the evolution of mankind. Each concept has been largely subjective. People choose to define these terms on their view of understanding with the world. There is a fundamental difference between organized religion and spirituality (Taylor, 2001).