代做assignment-项目计划

24 9月 代做assignment-项目计划

本文主要讲项目计划,从计算中可以看出,该项目的IRR明显为4%(见附录3),可以通过计算IRR低于WACC进行分析,这意味着该项目相对于资金成本的回报率可能较低。这个项目会损害投资者的财富和公司的业绩。从简单的现金流入法和现金流出法的结果可以看出,该项目最终有望提供正的现金流。25年后,预计该项目将在现金流方面产生巨大回报(见附录3)。本篇代做assignment文章由英国论文人EducationRen教育网整理,供大家参考阅读。

From the calculation, it is obvious that IRR of this project is 4% (See Appendix 3). It can be analysed based on the calculation that IRR is lower than the WACC, which means that the project is likely to provide low rate of return compared with the cost of capital. This project will harm the wealth of the investors and the firm’s performance. From the results of simple Cash in versus cash out method, it can be known that this project is expected to provide positive cash flows at the end. After 25 years, it is expected that this project will give great return in terms of cash flows (See Appendix 3).
It is determined from the PB outcomes that this project is not expected to cover the initial investment till the end of the project life which is 25 years (See Appendix 4). This indicates that project is not good in terms of covering the project cost during the project life. In the same way, negative NPV value is obtained from the calculation, which also shows that this project is not expected to maximize the wealth of the shareholders (See Appendix 5). Negative NPV value indicates that total present values is higher than the initial investment amount of the project. This method considers time value of money concept in accessing an investment proposal. Thus it is an effective method to determine the return from an investment. On the basis of this NPV value, it can be said that this project may have an influence on the return of shareholders and their benefits. It is clearly seen from the PI method that this project can provide negative returns (See Appendix 6). The obtained value of PI is -43% shows that this project may not be able to generate profitability for this firm.
Based on the above analysed results of investment appraisal techniques, it is recommended that Cutting Edge Limited should not go ahead with the Robot Project. The project is not likely to offer enough cash flows to offer greater return on investment (Gibson, 2012). This may affect the ability of this firm to maintain or improve satisfaction of the investors and market value.

英国论文人EducationRen教育网深得广大客户的支持和厚爱。我们的服务目标:缔造精品,善待一生!我们的服务宗旨:诚信至上,服务至上,客户至上!我们的服务理念:专业专注,优质服务!如果需要英国代写论文,就点击上方栏目列表,各种代写服务等着你,客服24小时在线,欢迎咨询!