論文 代寫-關於Binglee網站
另一方面，binglee的菜單選項一點也不清楚。它由10到12個菜單組成，在同一水平欄，這使它看起來不清楚。不過，Kogan錯過了其中一個要求，該要求通過錯過滑塊來確保更清晰。滑塊總是增加了網站的吸引力，並提供相同的清晰度。但這在一定程度上是通過產品的不同圖標和價格來實現的。 Kogan強調提供最重要的選項，這些選項首先在頭文件中搜索。他可以在網站提供的“熱門交易”選項中查看這些交易。好的用戶界面的第二個特點是簡潔。雖然清晰被認為是一個很好的網站選項，但重要的是不應該過分澄清一些選項。不需要在網站的主UI頁面中添加很多菜單定義。給更多的菜單會導致花更多的時間在閱讀上，而不是看著不同的菜單。與binglee相比，Kogan的網站更加簡潔。
網站包含了所有的需求，這樣用戶就可以輕鬆地閱讀這些內容，並且可以確保它們越來越多地與網站連接。在Binglee網站上，一些信息如聯繫電話和商店位置被重複了兩次。此外，在網站的上半部分和下半部分都提供了由不同部門組成的菜單。由此可見，binglee網站也缺乏簡潔性。熟悉度是網站UI的另一個重要特性。有許多設計使界面看起來有點直觀。 Kogan使用的設計與一些電子商務網站使用的設計有一定的關係。另一方面，Binglee使用了另一種用戶可能不太熟悉的設計。響應是網站的另一個重要特性。一個更簡潔的網站會比另一個網站反應更快。因此，與binglee相比，Kogan設計的網站響應速度更快。
論文 代寫-關於Binglee網站
The menu options on binglee on the other hand are not at all clearer. It consists of ten to twelve menus in the same horizontal bar which makes it look unclear. Though, Kogan has missed one of the requirements which assured more clarity by missing the slider. The slider always adds an appeal to the website and provides clarity to the same. But that has been fulfilled by the different icons of the products along with prices to a certain extent. Kogan has emphasized on providing the most important options, which the searches first in the header itself. He can check the deals in the ‘Hot Deals’ options provided in the website. The second feature of the good user interface is its conciseness. Though clarity is considered as a good option for a website, but it is important there should not be over clarification over some of the options. It is not required to add many definitions of menus in the main UI page of the website. Giving more number of menus will lead to spending more time on reading instead of looking at different menus. The website of Kogan is much more concise in compared to binglee.
The website consists of all the requirements in such a manner that the things are easy for the user to read with least effort, and can also ensure them to be connected to the website more and more. In Binglee websites, some of the information such as the contact number and the store locations has been repeated twice. Also, the menus consisting of different department has been provided both in the upper part and the lower part of the website. Thus, it is clear that the binglee website lacks conciseness as well. Familiarity is another important feature for the UI of the website. There are many designs which make the interface to appear a bit intuitive. The design which is used by Kogan is somehow related to the designs, which have been used by a number of ecommerce websites. Binglee on the other hand has used a different design which users may not be very familiar with.Responsiveness is a yet another important feature for the website. A website which will be more concise will be much more responsive than the other one. Thus, the website which has been designed by the Kogan is more responsive as compared to that of binglee.
英國論文人EducationRen教育網深得廣大客戶的支持和厚愛。我們的服務目標：締造精品，善待一生!我們的服務宗旨：誠信至上，服務至上，客戶至上!我們的服務理念：專業專注，優質服務!如果需要英國論文代寫，就點擊上方欄目列表，各種服務等著你，客服24小時在線，歡迎諮詢!