ps代写:马克思思想和洛克思想的区别

21 2月 ps代写:马克思思想和洛克思想的区别

ps代写:马克思思想和洛克思想的区别

就政府的权利和职能而言,毫无疑问,如果没有约翰·洛克所提出的一些理论,马克思所提出的可能性或思想就不会存在。约翰·洛克认为,一个国家的政府只有在国家和人民之间有社会契约安排,并且得到背后人民的支持时才能发挥作用。这是他的主要主张之一。此外,这个政府还提供了一些额外的权利,包括自由权、生命权和财产权。洛克的主张背后的主要思想是,为了一个政府能够维持它的统治,它必须在它的程序中是公平和公正的。除此之外,洛克还认为,一个国家的人民有权在执政政府运转不正常或他们的需求得不到满足的情况下发出声音或进行反抗。甚至马克思的思想与洛克的思想在这些方面都是一致的,但马克思的思想与洛克的思想略有不同。用马克思的话来说,要使经济发生变化,要解决社会上普遍存在的问题和斗争,关键是要使国家的人民采取立场,作出必要的调整。

ps代写:马克思思想和洛克思想的区别
他声称,这种变化不可能真正通过政府或制度框架实现。尽管马克思和洛克在资源公平分配问题上有相似的观点,但他们在定义自由的方式和对政府的信任上却不同。洛克对政府权力的信任是一种乐观的看法。然而,马克思所提出的观点,如果没有约翰·洛克所提出的基础,尤其是他关于反抗权和自然权利的著作,是不可能存在的。马克思和洛克的显著不同之处在于他们对私有财产的所有权。洛克认为,自然状态定义了完美意义上的自由状态。这意味着人们可以在自然法则的范围内处置自己的行为或财产,而不依赖于任何人的意志。洛克在其著作中肯定并陈述了卡尔·马克思的观点:“正如篡夺是他人有权行使的权力一样,暴政是超越权利的权力的行使,任何人都无权行使权利”(洛克1965)。

ps代写:马克思思想和洛克思想的区别

In terms of rights and the function of government, it could be argued without doubt that in the absence of some of the theories suggested by John Locke, the possibilities or ideas given by Marx would not have subsisted. According to John Locke, government in a country could only function if there is a social contractual arrangement between the state and the people and if it is supported by the people behind it. This was one of his primary assertions. Moreover, there were a number of additional rights offered by this government comprising of the right of liberty, life and the right of ownership of property. The main idea behind Locke’s assertion was that, in order for a government to sustain its rule, it had to be equitable and fair in its proceedings. In addition to this, Locke also believed that people of a country had the right to raise a voice or revolt if the ruling government is not functioning properly or if their needs are not being met. Even Marx’s idea was aligned on these lines with that of Locke’s, but there was a slight difference in what Marx believed. In the words of Marx, to bring about a change in an economy and to resolve the issues and struggles prevailing in the society, it is crucial for the people of the country to take a stand in order to make necessary adjustments.

ps代写:马克思思想和洛克思想的区别
He claimed that this change could not really be brought through the government or the institutional framework.Although Marx and Locke have similar views when it comes to equitable distribution of resources but they are different in their approach of when it comes to defining liberty and in the way they place their trust in the government. The trust that Locke places in the power of government is an optimist view. Still, the view that Marx proposed would not have existed without the groundwork suggested by John Locke, especially his work on the right to revolt and natural rights. The point where Marx and Locke appear to be significantly different is related to that of ownership of private property.According to Locke, the state of nature defines the state of freedom in perfect sense. This means that people can dispose of their actions or possessions without depending on the will of any one within the bounds of law of nature. Locke affirmed and stated the idea of Karl Marx in his words that, “As usurpation is the exercise of power which another has a right to, so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right, which nobody can have a right to” (Locke 1965).