本文主要讲述的是马克思思想和洛克思想的区别,就政府的权利和职能而言,毫无疑问,如果没有约翰·洛克所提出的一些理论,马克思所提出的可能性或思想就不会存在。约翰·洛克认为,一个国家的政府只有在国家和人民之间有社会契约安排,并且得到背后人民的支持时才能发挥作用。这是他的主要主张之一。此外,这个政府还提供了一些额外的权利,包括自由权、生命权和财产权。洛克的主张背后的主要思想是,为了一个政府能够维持它的统治,它必须在它的程序中是公平和公正的。本篇ps代写文章由英国论文人EducationRen教育网整理,供大家参考阅读。

In terms of rights and the function of government, it could be argued without doubt that in the absence of some of the theories suggested by John Locke, the possibilities or ideas given by Marx would not have subsisted. According to John Locke, government in a country could only function if there is a social contractual arrangement between the state and the people and if it is supported by the people behind it. This was one of his primary assertions. Moreover, there were a number of additional rights offered by this government comprising of the right of liberty, life and the right of ownership of property. The main idea behind Locke’s assertion was that, in order for a government to sustain its rule, it had to be equitable and fair in its proceedings. In addition to this, Locke also believed that people of a country had the right to raise a voice or revolt if the ruling government is not functioning properly or if their needs are not being met. Even Marx’s idea was aligned on these lines with that of Locke’s, but there was a slight difference in what Marx believed. In the words of Marx, to bring about a change in an economy and to resolve the issues and struggles prevailing in the society, it is crucial for the people of the country to take a stand in order to make necessary adjustments.

He claimed that this change could not really be brought through the government or the institutional framework.Although Marx and Locke have similar views when it comes to equitable distribution of resources but they are different in their approach of when it comes to defining liberty and in the way they place their trust in the government. The trust that Locke places in the power of government is an optimist view. Still, the view that Marx proposed would not have existed without the groundwork suggested by John Locke, especially his work on the right to revolt and natural rights. The point where Marx and Locke appear to be significantly different is related to that of ownership of private property.According to Locke, the state of nature defines the state of freedom in perfect sense. This means that people can dispose of their actions or possessions without depending on the will of any one within the bounds of law of nature. Locke affirmed and stated the idea of Karl Marx in his words that, “As usurpation is the exercise of power which another has a right to, so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right, which nobody can have a right to” (Locke 1965).

英国论文人EducationRen教育网深得广大客户的支持和厚爱。我们的服务目标:缔造精品,善待一生!我们的服务宗旨:诚信至上,服务至上,客户至上!我们的服务理念:专业专注,优质服务!如果需要了解英国论文代写价格,就点击上方栏目列表,各种代写服务等着你,客服24小时在线,欢迎咨询!