英国代写被抓：公司实力的代表
关于公司实力的论据是公司的历史。惠普现在在市场上已经有很长一段时间了，10年的时间，现在的所有者经营公司大约5年。研究表明，消费者对企业的信任通常是随着时间的推移而形成的，长期与企业在一起的消费者基础与企业的品牌联系更紧密(Orth & Greene, 2009;Sirdeshmukh，等，2002)。正如案例研究所称，这些是该公司的回头客。一个有力的反驳是，公司的客户基础已经从80%左右减少到不超过40%。作为反驳，虽然顾客基础的百分比已经减少，但仍然有很大比例的顾客仍然继续使用该公司，即使推出了新的果汁部门，情况将会改善。该公司的另一个优势是使用中草药。中药的使用给了企业一个独特的立足点，它是企业的核心力量，可以看到，它已经导致了约80%的回头客。
英国代写被抓：公司实力的代表
在波特的竞争优势下，这家公司被认为创造了独特的差异化。企业可能不会将惠普视为另一家医药公司或天然健康公司。为了获得竞争优势，公司正在使用一种独特的中草药。因此，独特的产品创造将确保公司能够吸引客户。这里可以提出一个相反的论点，虽然独特的中草药是作为解决一些医疗问题的用户，这没有被证明或没有被证明的工作。因此，在这种背景下，公司的实力本身可能是一种挑战。可以在这里陈述的反驳是,不管实际感知或主张的中草药,公司已经售出的所有者的草有益于人,这就是导致客户的增加,所以反驳了代表的想法可能会或可能没有太大可能客户为什么开始离开公司,但是它将会是一个好主意的企业主理解这是为什么发生。
英国代写被抓：公司实力的代表
The argument that can be made for the strength of the company is that of the history of the company. HP is in the market for a very long time now, for a period of 10 years and with the current owner operating the company for around 5 years. Research studies show that consumer trust in a business is usually formed with time and the consumer base who is with the company over a long time are more connected with the brand of the company (Orth & Greene, 2009; Sirdeshmukh, et al, 2002). As the case study called them, these are the repeat customers for the company. A counter argument that can be offered for this argument on strength is that the company’s customer base has dwindled from around 80 percent to no more than 40 percent. In rebuttal, although the percentage of the customer base had dwindled, there is a still a significant percentage still continuing with the company even albeit the introduction of the new fruit juice segment and with that introduction the situation would improve. Yet another strength of the company is that of using the Chinese herb. The use of the Chinese herb has given a unique standpoint for the business and it is the core strength of the business as it can be seen that it has led to around 80 percent in repeat customers.
英国代写被抓：公司实力的代表
Under Porter’s competitive advantage, this company is seen to have created a unique differentiation. Companies might not view HP as being yet another medicinal company or natural health company. A unique Chinese herb is being used by the company in order to achieve a competitive advantage. Unique product created will hence ensure that the company is able to attract customers. A counter argument that can be presented here is that, although the unique Chinese herb is presented as solving some medical problems for the user, this has neither been proved or not proved to work. So in this context the strength of the company could by itself be challenges. The rebuttal that can be stated here is that, irrespective of the perceived or the actual claims made on the Chinese herb, the owner of the company has managed to sell the idea that the herb is good for people and this is what has led to the increase in customers, so the counter argument made on behalf of the idea may or may not hold much might on why customers are starting to leave the company, yet it would be a good idea for the business owner to understand why this is happening.