英国代写essay：安全利益
位置苏在这方面很弱,最终决定将由法院会支持或反对起诉的要求对电子安全利益。苏拥有相当比例的电子股声称安全利益的权利。该公司目前面临着破产和苏是在这种情况下能够获得的好处她分享公司保持视图。然而,最终授予如果安全利益取决于向法院提供的证据。如果苏仍然成功地提供证据,它不会让她难以得到安全利益。该公司最近面临着许多不幸事件损坏了公司的财务状况在更大的程度上。在这种情况下通常公司不能支付成本如果法院给决定公司的青睐。有机会,本公司也将能减轻法院通过强调负面事件发生在最近的过去。苏和她也有一些依据使用它们可以改善她的位置,可以向她支付的费用。最初清算人否认了这一指控对安全利益因此起诉法院是唯一希望现有起诉她的要求进行验证。在这种情况下苏将不得不面对许多困难,因为苏发生盗窃价值500000美元股票的公司可以使用事件的支持从法院获得同情。500000美元是一个巨大的数量仍将能得到法院的注意有效地这将进一步被利用从法院起诉恩惠的主张对技术的安全利益。保持在查看公司的情况和事实和数字的最近的事件可以说,苏的说法完全取决于他的律师,如果他的能力仍然成功地挑战决定的清算人拒绝提供安全利益起诉。
英国代写essay：安全利益
The position Sue is quite weak in this regard and the ultimate decision will be made by court that will go in favour of or against Sue’s claim for security interest against Techno. As Sue owns a considerable proportion of Techno shares it is her right to claim security interest. The company is now faced with insolvency and Sue is in this case able to earn the benefits keeping in view her share in the company. However, the ultimate grant if security interests will depend upon the evidence provided to the court. If Sue remains successful in providing evidence, it will not be difficult for her to get security interest. The company has recently got faced with many unlucky events that damaged the financial position of the company to a larger extent. In these circumstances often companies are not able to pay costs if the court gives decision in the favour of company. There are chances that this company too will be able to get relief from the court by highlighting the negative events that took place in the recent past. Sue also has some rationales with her using them she can improve her position and can get the costs paid to her. Initially liquidator has rejected the claim of Sue against security interests therefore court is the only hope existing for Sue to get her claim validated. In this case Sue will have to face many hardships because sue to event of theft of $500,000 valued stocks company can use the event in its own favour to get sympathies from court. $500,000 is a huge amount that will remain able to get the attention of court effectively which will further be utilized to obtain favour from court against Sue’s claim of security interest against Techno. Keeping in view the circumstances of company and facts and figures of recent events it can be said that Sue’s claim will entirely depend on the ability of his lawyer if he remains successful in challenging the decision of liquidator who rejected the provision of security interest to Sue.