英国代写:作品评判

18 6月 英国代写:作品评判

英国代写:作品评判

Ricceur让一个点从口语,写作由以下“没有必要在这里我们考虑长度的概念言语事件的完整描述作为一个言语行为,这些行为给事件和意义的辩证方法。上面的陈述认为,作者在写作的时候,通常是在把更直观、更内在的言语行为转化为书面和外在的言语行为,这种转化的每一个行为都产生了一个事件和意义。金斯顿对她的传记和成长经历的描述,让人想起自己成长过程中经历的各种事件。成长的过程与人的认知、思维和感知能力的成长的一般理论没有什么不同。汤婷婷在写传记的时候,一定会记起她生活中的一些经历,一定也会忘记一些。因此,用传记的视角来评判她的其他作品,会限制读者的解读能力。
读者很有可能不会去探究作者通过书面内容不懈尝试的不同解释的可能性。判断在解读一篇书面作品时所起的作用,也贬低了作者真正期望读者去感知的实际解读。当读者没有得到真实的解读时,这对作者来说是一个巨大的损失,因为她的写作没有能够把最重要的信息传递给读者。爱泼斯坦对传记批评的反驳是这样的:“我选择的策略是我所谓的人物批评,一种批评形式,关注的是通过与作者的联系而联系在一起的思想、声音和情感的模式。然而,人格批评允许人们将作者身份描述为多重的,包括文化、心理、互文性,以及作者的传记资料。”

英国代写:作品评判

Ricceur makes a point about the transition from speaking to writing by the following“It is not necessary here that we consider at length the notion of the speech event in terms of its complete description as a speech act……each of these acts gives way to the dialectic of event and meaning.”The above statement maintains that the author when writing is generally transferring the speech act which is more visual and internal into written and external and that each of the acts of this transition gives birth to an event and meaning. Kingston describing her biography and the way she grew up makes one think about the various events that one goes through in growing up. The process of growing up is none different from the general theory of growth of one’s cognition and thinking and perceiving abilities. Kingston when writing her biography will have remembered certain experiences of her life and must have forgotten some. So judging her other texts with the lens of her biography will limit the interpretive abilities of the reader.
There is a very high chance that the reader may not explore the possibility of interpreting something different which the author is relentlessly trying through the written content. Role of judgement in interpreting a written piece is also derogatory to the actual interpretation that the author really expects the readers to perceive. When the reader does not get the actual interpretation, it is a big loss to the author as her writing has not been able to make the essential message pass to the reader as desired. Epstein contests the biographical criticism with the following affirmation:“The strategy I have chosen is what I call persona criticism, a form of criticism that focuses on patterns of ideation, voice and sensibility linked together by a connection to the author. Yet persona criticism allows one to speak of authorship as multiple, involving culture, psyche, and intertextuality, as well as biographical data about the author.”