英国论文代写哪家好：文化相对主义
它应谴责各国政府的这种行为，这种行为已达到滥用职权的地步，但许多国家已无力应付跨国公司。在一些国家，不充分的规章和无效的执行相结合，导致肆无忌惮的公司明显的错误行为。例如，最近，一群投资者对恢复名为SSUnited的豪华邮轮表现出了相当大的兴趣。在开始恢复之前，船上的石棉衬里必须先拆除。一家美国公司根据美国标准竞标去除石棉。这项工作的价格定在1亿美元。与此同时，乌克兰塞瓦斯托波尔的一家公司提出以不到200万美元的价格提供同样的职位。几个月后，这艘船被移到了塞瓦斯托波尔。文化相对主义者的结果是有问题的，即使他们自己没有发现问题。虽然，一个国家有权建立自己的安全和健康条例，但在上述情况下，合同的条款和标准可能没有保护塞瓦斯托波尔的工人免受已知的健康危险(Frank 1991)。即使合同符合乌克兰的标准，有道德的商人也必须反对。
文化相对主义存在着道德盲目性。公司和跨文化必须坚持一些基本的价值观。站在文化相对主义的另一端是伦理帝国主义。这指导人们在任何地方做他们在家里一直在做的事情。这是一种可以理解的吸引人的方法，但有明显的不足之处。例如，1993年，一家生产电脑产品的美国公司在沙特阿拉伯的工厂开设了一门关于性骚扰的课程。在全球一致性的旗帜下，培训沙特阿拉伯管理人员的教员采用了与美国管理人员相同的方法。他们被建议讨论一个案例，在这个案例中，经理反唇相讥，在酒吧喝酒时对新来的女员工说了一些露骨的话。在一种管理男女关系的严格原则的文化中，教员没有考虑到练习的工作。因此，这次培训课程产生了荒谬。讲师冒犯了来自沙特阿拉伯的参与者，并使他们感到困惑，而有关性别歧视和避免胁迫的信息也丢失了。
英国论文代写哪家好：文化相对主义
It is condemnable of such actions by the governments amounting to abuses, but it is beyond capacity of many countries to handle the transnational corporations. In a number of countries, the conjunction of insufficient regulations and ineffective enforcement results in clearly wrong behaviour by the unscrupulous companies. For example, in the recent past, there was considerable interest by a group of investors on restoring luxury ocean liner called SSUnited States. The asbestos lining of the ship had to be removed first before restoring can commence. An U.S. company bid to remove the asbestos on the basis of the U.S. standards. The price of the job was fixed at $100 million. At the same time, a company based on Sevastopol, Ukraine gave an offer for the same job at less than $2 million. Within a few months, the ship was moved to Sevastopol.There are problems with the outcome of cultural relativists, even though, they themselves find no problem with it. Although, there is the right for a country in establishing its own safety and health regulations, in the above case, the contract’s terms and standards might not have protected the Sevastopol’s workers from the known risks towards health (Frank 1991). Even in the event of standards of Ukraine are met by the contract, the business persons who are ethical must have objected.
There is moral blindness in the cultural relativism. The companies and cross cultures must upheld some fundamental values. Standing at the cultural relativism’s other end of the spectrum is ethical imperialism. This directs individuals in doing everywhere what they have been doing at home. It is an approach that is understandably appealing, but has the clear indication of inadequacy. For example, a U.S. company producing computer products came up with a course in 1993 on sexual harassment in its facility in Saudi Arabia. Under the global consistency banner, the same approach was used by the instructors in training the managers of Saudi Arabia that had been used with mangers of United States. They were advised in discussing a case, where manager retorted to making a remark that is sexually explicit to new woman employee in a bar over a drink. The instructor had no consideration with respect to the working of the exercise in a culture having stringent principles that governs the relationships between men and women. Consequently, this training session resulted in absurdity. The instructor offended and baffled the participants from Saudi Arabia and the message is lost that involved sexual discrimination and avoidance of coercion.