英国论文怎么写：英国石油公司石油泄漏
英国石油公司漏油事件是历史上最严重的漏油事件之一。损坏的金额在成本方面，也生活是巨大的。然而，从合法性理论的角度来看，有许多问题要问。其中一个主要问题是有关此类事件的法律。他们有多严格，哪些方面是他们所涵盖的。另一个问题是公司的责任和公司的印象中的差异，通过他们的出版物的行动，并在公司所采取的行动/步骤。
英国论文怎么写：英国石油公司石油泄漏
本文通过舍恩鲍姆他谈论负责石油公司责任泄漏。他对美国在1990年内通过的国际制度和石油污染法进行了比较，这是从这个国际责任分离。它说，美国的行动是更好的广度和更全面的比国际。因此，笔者得出结论认为，国际制度需要有更好的指导，因为它不包括深水勘探。本文还讨论了在美国法和国际法下可以恢复的损害赔偿的类型。作者谈到了石油泄漏的必要性和石油泄漏引起的损害，这是国际海事组织的一大关注。
英国论文怎么写：英国石油公司石油泄漏
本文从1971国际制度的形成的历史开始，如何创造了资金，并有责任也转移到业主。通过在1984和1992年采用更多的协议，国际海事组织所采用的民事责任得到了进一步的提高。然后在2000年，有进一步增加的责任公司在溢油（基兰和奎师那，2010）。
英国论文怎么写：英国石油公司石油泄漏
BP oil spill can be regarded as one of the worst oil spills in the history. The amount of damaged done in terms of cost and also lives was huge. However, there are many questions to be asked from legitimacy theory perspective. One of the main questions is the laws governing such incidents. How strict are they and what aspects are covered by them. The other question is the responsibility of the firm and the difference in the impression made by the firm through their publications of their actions and in actions/steps undertaken by the firm.
英国论文怎么写：英国石油公司石油泄漏
In the article by Schoenbaum he talks about liability for the firm responsible for the oil spills. He gives a comparison between the international regime and the Oil Pollution Act adopted by USA in the year 1990 which is separate from this international liability. It says that the US act is better in terms of breadth and is more comprehensive than the international. Thus, the author concludes that the international regime needs to have better guidance as it does not cover the deepwater exploration. This article also talks about the type of damages which can be recovered under the US law and the international law. Author talks about the necessity of the oil and the damages caused by the oil spill which is a big concern for the International Maritime Organization.
英国论文怎么写：英国石油公司石油泄漏
This paper starts with the history of formation of the international regime in 1971, how the fund was created and there liability was also shifted to the cargo owners. The Civil Liability adopted by IMO was further given boost by adopting more Protocols in the year 1984 and 1992. Then in the year 2000, there was further increase in the liability of the firm in case of oil spill (Kiran & Krishna, 2010).