代写assignment:量化智力的不同维度

18 3月 代写assignment:量化智力的不同维度

代写assignment:量化智力的不同维度

弗林和沃里克表示,智力无法通过标准测试来衡量,智力的范围需要扩大。弗林的文章是关于量化智力的不同维度。文章中的这些观点认为,智力是由社会一致性所定义的。他们受到跨文化差异的影响。沃里克大学的一篇文章是关于智力的根源的。沃里克以物种间和物种生存的例子作为证据,证明只有聪明的适应性强的物种才能生存。没有智慧的物种最终会灭绝。作者甚至想知道,根据这一原则,如果人类不发展智力,机器将取代人类(沃里克213)。在许多地方,沃里克的论点得到了弗林的进一步支持。从这两篇文章中推断出的主要思想是智能测量是主观的。沃里克举了物种间关系的例子,弗林也举了发生在社会中的例子。可以看出,这两种条款所提出的主张是相互替代的。

代写assignment:量化智力的不同维度
智力不能用任何标准测试来衡量,这是很令人同意的。科学家们花了很多努力来解释认知功能和情绪使用标准测试。这些设计出来的比较测试是用来比较一个人的智力的。这是弗林在文章中提出的主张。弗林关注智商测试,并对弗林测试进行了深入的分析。在社会中,似乎有必要用生理行为来证明大脑的合理性,而不是解释大脑的社会方面和情感。这导致了对智力的错误定义(弗林159)。沃里克指出,智力无法通过标准测试或协议来理解。尽管他也说智力是相对的,但他引入了语境的变量。有人说,智力变化的测量是基于比较相对量表的。在这种情况下,可以理解华威声称智商测试是无效的或无关紧要的。这使得沃里克和弗林的说法形成了关键的对比。

代写assignment:量化智力的不同维度

Flynn and Warwick have stated that intelligence cannot be measured by standard tests and scope of intelligence needs to be extended. Flynn article is about the different dimensions involved in quantifying intelligence. These points in the articles claim that intelligence is defined by the social conformities. They are influence by cross culture differences. Warwick article is about the very root of intelligence. Warwick has used examples of interspecies and survival of species as evidence that only intelligent adaptable species survive. Species that are not intelligence eventually becomes extinct. Author has even wondered that by this principle humans will be replaced by machines if they do not develop intelligence (Warwick 213). In many places Warwick argument is further bolstered by the argument made by Flynn. The main ideology that has been inferred from both these articles is that intelligent measurement is subjective. Warwick has used the example of inter species relationship and Flynn has cited the examples that occurred in societies.It can be seen that the claims made by both the articles serve as substitute to one another.

代写assignment:量化智力的不同维度
It is quite agreeable that intelligence cannot be measured by using any standard tests. Scientists take a lot of efforts to explain the cognitive functions and sentiments using standard tests. These comparative tests that have been devised are used to measure intelligence of a person comparatively. This is the claim made in the article by Flynn. Flynn has given focus on the IQ tests and also has analyzed in great depth about Flynn tests. In the society there seems to be a need to justify brain in terms of physiological actions and not explain the social aspects and emotions of brain. This has lead to flawed definition of intelligence (Flynn 159). Warwick states that intelligence cannot be comprehended by standard tests or protocols. Even though he also states that Intelligence is relative he introduces the variable of context. It has been said that measurement of intelligence changes based on a comparative relative scale. In this scenario it can be understood that Warwick states that IQ test are not effective or relevant. This creates a situation where there is key contrast between the claim made by Warwick and Flynn.