代写论文:适应新的社会

28 3月 代写论文:适应新的社会

代写论文:适应新的社会

已经提到的格雷斯,进化的人类部落的形式发生了,因此,他们仍然部落。除了血液关系和家庭,很多文化和社会关系与特定群体属于联盟(格雷斯9)。有分离的人群通过在社会中的每个和每一个层面。从家庭到国家,它是一个巨大的系统树图的组织和关系,在相互连接。很明显,总有一些价值超过生活在人类的生活,喜欢文化或自我尊重(格雷斯,12)。就像一直在文章中提到的,“全球化:两个人类的未来的愿景,”个人宁愿放弃自己的生活,而不是文化的损失,作为一个重要的例子,爱家庭的好名声,等某一爱好棒球。有可能,所有的棒球球迷将支持一个团队的棒球吗?答案是否定的。任何团队都有自己的文化,总是吸引人的爱。顺向的方式,没有机会,文化的差异可能消失,他们可以团结(格雷斯,15)。

代写论文:适应新的社会

在类似的情况下,国防在自我利益无法消除的名字吗?为什么会有脆弱国家和强大的国家?从而使他们不同吗?国家和文化的力量可以被认为是最相关的因素,可以帮助确定一个国家是薄弱或强大的(萨•6)。

代写论文:适应新的社会

It has been mentioned by Gleiser that evolution of humans have taken place in the form of tribes, and hence, they are still tribal. Beyond the blood relations and the families, a number of cultural and social relations have been vested in alliance with specific group (Gleiser 9). There is separation of groups done by people in each and every single level within the society. From families to nation, it is known to be a large dendrogram of groups and relation, which are in connection with each other. It is evident that there is always some worth more than life in the life of humans, like culture or self- respect (Gleiser, 12). Just as it has been mentioned in the article, “Globalization: Two visions of the future of humanity,” individuals would rather be giving up their lives rather than the loss of culture, as a significant example, the good reputation of family, and the love for a certain hobby such as baseball. Is there a possibility that all fans of baseball will be supporting one team of baseball? The answer is no. Any team has its own culture, always with the attraction of people for loving it. In a consequent manner, there is no chance that the differences in culture may vanish and they can be united as one (Gleiser, 15).

代写论文:适应新的社会

In the similar context, people who defence in the name of self- interest cannot be eliminated? Why are there weak nations and powerful nations? Which results in making them different? National and cultural power can be considered as the most relevant factors that helps in determining if a nation is weak or powerful (Krishnamurthy, 6).

Tags: