论文代写：象征式互动论象徵式互动论
三预测由Shrauger和舍尼曼回顾，1979对符号互动论。这三个预言是包容性首先对事实的自我认知的人和人对别人怎么想他们的看法都是这样的概念，涉及大量的信件，然后自我知觉的人从他人的角度和实际需求的需要之间，再次大幅对应它们的看法，人其他人和人实际上是感知方式的感知也应该基本对应。进行研究的指示导致的事实，即最高的对应水平之间存在的自我感知的人和实际感知他人。人的自我感知和他人对现实的感知都弱对应。然而，预测的个人，其他人可能会想到他们和他人的实际感知的自我参与的混合结果模式。研究结果说明，即使支持确证了所有涉及的预测，它仍然不会导致支持互动的象征地位的因果关系的方向是不知道的。
戈夫曼的研究结果显示，药物在社会道德的商人。从这个比喻的建议导致说明，道德规范不是简单地其次是人的代理人，而这些人的代理人在特定情况下作为积极的谈判的影响和行为规范的应用。此外，调查结果在描绘自我形象的道德代理人在社会上出售给他人，促进他们的自我形象，除了采用和动员选择性道德规范的战略方式。从单纯的研究然而戏剧性的过程理论应运而生，戈夫曼也是符号互动的重要观点。Dramaturgy发现的过程是一个从戏剧的角度研究社会互动分析。这是进一步指出戈夫曼在这种方法下，个体可以被看作是一个戏剧演员。戈夫曼的研究结果显示，药物在社会道德的商人。从这个比喻的建议导致说明，道德规范不是简单地其次是人的代理人，而这些人的代理人在特定情况下作为积极的谈判的影响和行为规范的应用。此外，调查结果在描绘自我形象的道德代理人在社会上出售给他人，促进他们的自我形象，除了采用和动员选择性道德规范的战略方式。从单纯的研究然而戏剧性的过程理论应运而生，戈夫曼也是符号互动的重要观点。Dramaturgy发现的过程是一个从戏剧的角度研究社会互动分析。这是进一步指出戈夫曼在这种方法下，个体可以被看作是一个戏剧演员。
论文代写：象征式互动论象徵式互动论
Three predictions were reviewed by Shrauger and Schoeneman, 1979 on symbolic interactionism. These three predictions were inclusive firstly of the fact that self-perception of people and the perception of people on what others think about them are both such conceptions that involve substantial correspondence, secondly self-perception of people and actual perception of them from others perspectives demands to have a substantial correspondence to be present in between and thirdly, perception of people on the way others perceive them and the way people actually are perceiving them should also be substantially corresponding. The indication of the study performed resulted in the fact that highest correspondence levels are present between self-perception of people and actual perception of others. Self-perception of people and actual perception of people from the perspective of others are both weakly corresponding. However, the prediction of individuals in which others may be thinking about them and the actual perception of others on the self-involved mixed result patterns. The study resulted in explaining that even if support of conclusiveness is given to all the involved predictions, still it would not lead towards supporting the symbolic position of interactionists as causal relation direction remains not known.
The findings of Goffman’s study revealed that agents in the society are morality merchants. The suggestion from this metaphor resulted in illustrating that moral norms are not simply followed by human agents rather these human agents in particular situations act as active negotiators of implications and behavioral norms applications. In addition, the findings resulted in depicting that self-image by moral agents in the society is sold to others by promoting their self-image in addition to employing and mobilizing the selective moral codes in a strategic manner. From the mere study however the dramaturgical process theory came into being as developed from Goffman which is also an essential perspective in symbolic interaction. The analysis of Dramaturgy revels that the process is a social interaction study from the perspective of theater. It was further stated by Goffman under this approach that individuals can be viewed as actors performing in a theater. The findings of Goffman’s study revealed that agents in the society are morality merchants. The suggestion from this metaphor resulted in illustrating that moral norms are not simply followed by human agents rather these human agents in particular situations act as active negotiators of implications and behavioral norms applications. In addition, the findings resulted in depicting that self-image by moral agents in the society is sold to others by promoting their self-image in addition to employing and mobilizing the selective moral codes in a strategic manner. From the mere study however the dramaturgical process theory came into being as developed from Goffman which is also an essential perspective in symbolic interaction. The analysis of Dramaturgy revels that the process is a social interaction study from the perspective of theater. It was further stated by Goffman under this approach that individuals can be viewed as actors performing in a theater.