英国论文代写：柯尔伯格模型
采用基于决策模型的模型的特点，可以看出，主要是在伦理困境的人必须确保所采取的决定应该反思的是利益相关者，即使好不能做为利益相关者，坏的不能做（乔林&戴维斯，2000，711-727页。）。这里违反了这条主要规则。在为某些人获得好处的风险中，其他人面临着消极的后果。第二种观点认为，道德价值观必须优先于非伦理价值观。首席执行官、首席风险官莎拉和部门主管不考虑所有的利益相关者，也选择了非道德的路线。另一方面，Sam Rogers也面临进退两难的局面，但他又不得不采取同样的行动方针，正如他的上级建议的那样，因为他没有选择。
运用柯尔伯格模型的道德发展有三个层次，在第一个前常规水平，一人做任何事，为了避免惩罚或惩罚（豆，和Bernardi，2007，页64。）。第二层次是社会形成的习俗，这里提出了正义行为的社会规范。下一级是后常规或社会契约的水平。这是一个人可能会觉得做什么是正确的正义的内在意义。在给定的电影中，Sam Rogers可以说是在传统的水平，他可能已经做了他的上司要求他做的，因为害怕失去他的工作，退休福利或更多。然而，这部电影也意味着可能的社会规范去做他们做的。尤其是首席执行官说，这是在他们的工作路线是正常的。
英国论文代写：柯尔伯格模型
Applying the ‘Character-Based Decision-Making Model’ model, it is seen that primarily a person in an ethical dilemma will have to ensure that the decisions being taken should reflect on the well being of the stakeholder such that even when good cannot be done for stakeholders, bad must not be done (Anderson, & Davies, 2000, pp. 711-727.). This primary rule is breached here. At the risk of acquiring good for some, others are seen to be facing negative consequences. The second reasoning states that it is necessary for ethical values to take precedence over non-ethical ones. The CEO, the chief risk officer Sarah and the division head do not consider all the stakeholders and also chose a non-ethical route. On the other hand, Sam Rogers also faces the dilemma but is again forced to take up the same course of action as suggested by his higher ups as he does not have a choice. Applying the ‘Character-Based Decision-Making Model’ model, it is seen that primarily a person in an ethical dilemma will have to ensure that the decisions being taken should reflect on the well being of the stakeholder such that even when good cannot be done for stakeholders, bad must not be done (Anderson, & Davies, 2000, pp. 711-727.). This primary rule is breached here. At the risk of acquiring good for some, others are seen to be facing negative consequences. The second reasoning states that it is necessary for ethical values to take precedence over non-ethical ones. The CEO, the chief risk officer Sarah and the division head do not consider all the stakeholders and also chose a non-ethical route. On the other hand, Sam Rogers also faces the dilemma but is again forced to take up the same course of action as suggested by his higher ups as he does not have a choice. Applying the Kohlberg’s model for moral development which has three levels, at the first Pre-Conventional level, a person does anything to avoid punishment or penalization (Bean, & Bernardi, 2007, pp. 64.). In the second level are the conventions formed by society, here the social norms of for righteous action are presented. The next level is the post conventional or the social contract level. This is where a person might feel an innate sense of justice to do what is right. In the given movie, Sam Rogers may be said to be at the pre-Conventional level, he might have done what his superiors asked him to do, because of fear of losing his job, retirement benefits or more. However, the movie also implies that it might be social norm to do what they do. Especially the CEO is shown to be saying that this was normal in their line of work.