英国论文代写：破产的法律文章分析。资不抵债是指债务人没有对其债务进行必要的偿付。现金流资不抵债和资产负债表资不抵债是可以观察到的两种资不抵债类型。破产可能发生在公司申请破产之前。英国论文代写专家的目的是分析一篇关于破产的法律文章，概述重要领域，并对其进行批判性分析。
与澳大利亚破产法相比，美国破产法可能更宽松，更不平衡。Lewis(2001)的文章通过比较澳大利亚和美国的破产法，强调了这一问题，并强调了它们具有相同的普通法根源。最初由作者提出的早期破产法(普通法的根源)是在1570年设计的，即使在债务人的资产清算和分配之后，也没有清偿债务人的选择。这是一个很有问题的观点。然后对当前美国破产法中债务人解除债务的选择进行了研究。美国和澳大利亚都有一些解决破产问题的方法，比如申请破产。债权人和债务人都可以申请破产，而且债务人的解除方式有一些共性。在过去，早在1570年，根据普通法，债务人不会被解除债务，而是会被监禁，而在现在，在破产的地方，债务人可以被解除债务。虽然这些首字母问题已经得到解决，但应该表现出多大的宽容和如何实现公平也是一个问题。
美国破产法似乎对债务人更为宽容。一个更宽松的法律可能会导致更多的债务人使用这个系统，而债权人可能会失去信任，所以真正的人可能不会得到必要的信用额度来经营他们的业务。另一方面，如果法律非常严格，那么人们可能会因为害怕失败而不去创业。建议美国破产法必须像澳大利亚破产法一样平衡。
英国论文代写专家提出了个人破产在美国呈上升趋势的观点。作者似乎认为，美国在破产时对债务人的义务的履行较为宽容，而澳大利亚则较为平衡。因此，作者们推荐:“澳大利亚的个人破产方法在债务人和债权人的权利之间达成了一种不同而有趣的平衡，这样做反映了其破产制度核心的一种不同于美国的意识形态”(Lewis, 2001，第335页)。
这些都是重要的问题，因为它们突出了如何以对债权人和债务人公平的方式处理破产。如果在债务人和债权人的问题上没有一个平衡，法律就会变得不公平。
The problem identified is that American Bankruptcy law might be more lenient and less balanced compared to the Australian Bankruptcy law. The article of Lewis (2001) highlighted this problem by comparing Australian and American bankruptcy laws and it also highlighted that they share the same common law roots. The early bankruptcy statute (the common law roots) as first presented by the authors was designed in the year 1570, with no option for discharge of the debtor even after their assets were liquidated and distributed. This was a much problematic standpoint. Then the work goes on to present American Bankruptcy law in current times where there are options for the debtor to be discharged. Both the United State and Australia have some way to work insolvency issues by claiming bankruptcy. The creditor or the debtor can both apply for bankruptcy, and there are some commonalities in the way the debtor could get discharged. In the past, as early as in 1570, under common law, the debtor would not be discharged, but would be imprisoned, while in current time, under situ of insolvency, the debtor could be discharged. While these initials issues have been solved, how much leniency should be shown and how fairness can be achieved is also a problem.
American Bankruptcy law appears to be more forgiving to the debtor. A more lenient law could lead to more debtors using the system, and creditors might lose trust, so genuine people might not get the necessary line of credit to run their business. On the other hand, if the law is very strict, then it could so happen that people might not start a business as they may fear its failure. It is recommended that the American bankruptcy laws must become as balanced as Australian laws.
The author presents the viewpoint that personal bankruptcies in America are on the rise. The author seems to present America as being a little more lenient when it comes to discharge of duties of a debtor in the case of insolvency, and Australia as being more balanced. Authors hence recommend this, “The Australian approach to personal bankruptcy strikes a different and interesting balance between the rights of debtors and creditors, and in doing so reflects a different ideology at the core of its bankruptcy system than is seen in the United States” (Lewis, 2001, p. 335).
These are issues of importance as they highlight how to deal with insolvency in a manner that is fair to the creditors and the debtors. Without a balance in how issues are addressed for debtors versus creditors, the law could become unfair.
以上内容就是英国论文代写专家对破产的法律文章分析。同学们如需了解有关更多英国论文代写专家的服务，详情可以在线咨询英国论文代写在线服务。我们的论文代写专家在严格的论文交付期限内完成工作，并致力于为留学生提供高质量的论文代写服务。并提供100%无抄袭内容，可以通过窃检测软件进行检查。因此请同学们寻求英国论文代写网站并立即订购您的个性化论文!