在传统的楔形法的情况下，这些力似乎是由多边形分析来描述的，并且这些图表在最初的力上是一致的，用来确定强迫平衡的结构。扩展是用三个楔形机制的假设的形式来描述的，这是用来进行分析的。广义楔形法的主要焦点是以强迫平衡的形式存在，并指出典型的楔形力作用于其上。因此，解决方案似乎是由第一个楔子进行的，这是通过强制平衡符号来表示的。它变成了描述相同符号的最简单的方法，它被用来解释解。计算似乎取决于平衡的时刻，并表示使用相同的主楔。所做的假设完全依赖于楔子的相同原理，即从强迫平衡计算中得到的夹层位置。从竖向有效应力中可以很容易地确定力的假设位置，并说明该力矩是用来检查过程的。因此，逆时针的运动被证明是负的，而顺时针的点在性质上是正的。
在考虑异质性的同时，引入的材料的重量计算的楔形。它与膨胀和地层长度的收缩有关。使用摩擦力和内聚方法可以明显地表示膨胀。平均失效原因是使用这些方法，并且可以通过对材料的交叉形式来扩展。平均内聚力的增强和摩擦角的增加，表明了平衡力和力的计算。一般的内聚是通过图中所示的地层膨胀的形式得到适当的说明。
In the case of conventional wedge method, the forces are seemed to be depicted by the polygon analysis and the charts are shown to coincide on the initial forces that are used for determining the structure of the forced equilibrium. The extension is being depicted in the form of the assumptions of the three wedge mechanism which is being used for the analysis. The primary focus of the generalized wedge method is indicating to be in the form of the forced equilibrium, and the typical wedge forces are indicated to be acting on it. Thus, the solution seems to be proceeding by the first wedge which is being signified by the help of the forced equilibrium notation. It becomes the easiest way for depicting the equal notations which are being used for illustrating the solutions. The calculation seems to be depending on the moment of the equilibrium and is indicated to be using the same principal wedge. The assumptions made are totally dependent on the same principle of the wedge in which the interslice locations are obtained from the forced equilibrium calculations. The assumption positions of the force can be easily determined from the vertical effective stress and the moment is illustrated to be checking the proceedings. Thus, the anticlockwise movements are shown to be negative, and the clockwise points are illustrated to be positive in nature.
As per the heterogeneity is being considered, the material introduced in the form of the weight calculations of the wedges. It is related to being expansion and the contraction of the length of the stratum. The expansion is being clearly signified by the using the friction and the cohesion methods. The average failure reason is determined to be using these methods, and the case can be expanded by the form of the cross facing the materials. The enhancement of the average cohesion and the angle of the friction are used showing the equilibrium and the force calculations. The average cohesion is being appropriately illustrated by the form of the expansion of the stratum which is shown in the following figure.